blimps are cool too

Month

October 2010

34 posts

Procrastination and popcorn movies → newyorker.com

[P]eople were asked to pick one movie to watch that night and one to watch at a later date. Not surprisingly, for the movie they wanted to watch immediately, people tended to pick lowbrow comedies and blockbusters, but when asked what movie they wanted to watch later they were more likely to pick serious, important films.

] via What We Can Learn from Procrastination at the New Yorker

Oct 31, 2010
#social dynamics #psychology
Oct 31, 2010205 notes
UX Magazine: Daniel Burka on Gaming Dynamics in User Experience Design → uxmag.com

“I think the idea that Web applications are now becoming mature enough that we can start thinking about joy, and about surprise, and making a much more rounded experience than just one that’s usable, I think that’s really exciting… there are a lot of places we’re going to see game ideas put into applications in ways that we’re not going to see it and say, ‘Hey, that’s just like a game.’ So it’s going to be in much more subtle ways and much more disparate ways than building a full integrated game into an application.”

Oct 27, 2010
#technology
What we can learn from procrastination : The New Yorker → newyorker.com

Oct 27, 2010
Eric Schmidt Says People Unhappy With Google Street View ‘Can Just Move’ → digitaldaily.allthingsd.com
Oct 26, 2010
Editorial Friended by ‘The Social Network’ → editorsguild.com

Assistant editors Tyler Nelson and Alex Olivares spearheaded the [Social Network’sconforming process.  “The assistants in this workflow essentially become the lab—they conform, they finish effects, all those things,” Baxter emphasizes. After the conform, only final color correction went outside.

Oct 23, 2010
#filmmaking #post-production
“Policy wonks talk about political ideologies as sets of value weights to use in policy tradeoffs … I’m suggesting instead that “Politics Isn’t About Policy.” In large polities, the main function of our politics in our lives is how it influences the way others see us; its influence on us via policy is far weaker. But it looks bad to admit we do politics to selfishly show off, instead of to help society make better policy. So we are built to instead talk, and think, as if we do politics for its influence on policy; we are build to be self-deceived about how politics matters to us.” —] Robin Hanson, Political Signalling Theories
Oct 23, 2010
#politics #social dynamics
Play
Oct 22, 2010
Battlestar Galactica writer goes back to the future → smh.com.au

”Don’t write for an audience,” she said. ”Write what you want to see.”

Espenson also had another, less contentious, bit of advice: watch what you want to write. ”Work backwards,” she said. ”If there’s a TV show you really like, watch your favourite episode and re-create the outline. Now you’ll know what a good outline looks like. That’s how I taught myself.”

Oct 22, 2010
Fears and Questions of Science Fiction → screenculture.net

the ‘science’ at the heart of the SciFi narrative can be defined as simply the plausible ability to do that which we otherwise cannot and that this ability – as Twilight Zone creator Rod Serling famously described – is The improbable made possible. This distinction is important as it tells us what it is that removes SciFi from Fantasy and it also explains some of the power Sci Fi has to garner intense cultural resonance – it has plausibility and and it has ramifications for the here and the now.

Oct 22, 2010
Why Companies Should Insist that Employees Take Naps → blogs.hbr.org

Good luck, right? But here’s the reality: naps are a powerful source of competitive advantage. The

Oct 18, 2010
Oct 15, 201071 notes
Oct 15, 201081 notes
Oct 15, 20101 note
#space elevator #payload
Women and 'The Wire' < PopMatters → popmatters.com
Oct 14, 2010
Oct 14, 2010
Oct 14, 2010
#film
The Darjeeling Limited: Voyage to India | From the Current - The Criterion Collection → criterion.com

Like all of Anderson’s works, The Darjeeling Limited offers highly aestheticized settings, but this film, unlike the others, seems to derive much of its stylization not from art direction but from a documentary-like attentiveness to preexisting locations.

Oct 13, 2010
Let Me In: Evil in America → blogs.suntimes.com


The American version wouldn’t be a “godless” community. These were communities connected to faith. Especially at that time, in the Reagan era — right when Reagan was giving his Evil Empire speech. So, at that time, we thought of evil as something that was other - the Soviets — while Americans were fundamentally good. Now, imagine, what would it be like to be a 12-year-old in this world, a kid bullied so mercilessly that he gets these dark thoughts. Being in that community and having those kinds of feelings: Are you evil? In the book, he’s obsessed with serial killers. So I had to find a way to translate the essence of that story into this place that I remembered. At the same time, I knew I wanted to be really faithful to the story.

Matt Reeves, the director, quoted in this fantastic review of Let Me In. This made me *excited* to see this film. 

Oct 13, 2010
#filmmaking
How Sexism Threatens to Undermine the Internet → themillions.com

The key difference between the films that Mulvey dissects in her essay and the personal blogs I’m talking about is agency. The films were made by men — men called the shots (literally) and wrote the stories that cast women in the passive roles. Obviously a personal blogger decides what to post on her blog. But while this difference is worth noting, it doesn’t seem to matter much in terms of the audience’s reaction. In fact, the blogger’s agency frequently becomes a weapon for the blogger’s critics. “Well, if she doesn’t want to be called a slut, maybe she shouldn’t post such provocative photos.” Doesn’t this sound a bit like the “She was asking for it” argument?

Fantastic article via Musings of an Inappropriate Woman

Oct 11, 2010
#social dynamics #gender politics
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January
  • February 1
  • March 1
  • April
  • May 3
  • June 7
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 3
  • February 16
  • March 5
  • April 2
  • May 2
  • June 8
  • July 4
  • August 2
  • September 4
  • October 8
  • November 1
  • December 4
2010 2011 2012
  • January 16
  • February 12
  • March 16
  • April 22
  • May 21
  • June 11
  • July 6
  • August 15
  • September 15
  • October 10
  • November 9
  • December 6
2009 2010 2011
  • January 25
  • February 22
  • March 13
  • April 23
  • May 13
  • June 19
  • July 6
  • August 6
  • September 20
  • October 34
  • November 12
  • December 8
2008 2009 2010
  • January 81
  • February 70
  • March 67
  • April 27
  • May 36
  • June 21
  • July 33
  • August 37
  • September 21
  • October 23
  • November 24
  • December 13
2007 2008 2009
  • January 4
  • February 15
  • March 32
  • April 30
  • May 31
  • June 8
  • July 24
  • August 32
  • September 27
  • October 24
  • November 36
  • December 55
2007 2008
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November 21
  • December 14